Figma comments for code prototypes: an alternative for AI-made HTML
Figma comments are the gold standard for feedback on design files. But an AI-made HTML prototype isn't a design file: it's code that runs, with hover states, real data and logic. Ollav is for reviewing that kind of artifact. Checked November 2026; check each vendor's site for current details.
Who this is for
Teams that already live in Figma for design, and now also get working HTML pages from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Codex that need the same kind of review.
Side by side
| Ollav | Figma comments | |
|---|---|---|
| What you review | One self-contained HTML file (up to 15 MB), running in the browser | Figma design files and prototypes |
| Real interactivity and code behaviour | Yes: it's the actual page | Prototype flows, not your code |
| Pinned comments | Yes, with emoji reactions and emoji pins | Yes |
| Reviewers | Signed-in: members or invited guests | Figma users with file access |
| New version, same link | Yes, earlier comments kept | Versioning inside the file |
| Agents read, reply, resolve and publish a new version | Yes (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex via MCP/API) | Check the vendor's site |
| Pricing | Free tier, Pro EUR 12/mo, Team EUR 10/seat/mo (min 3 seats) | Check the vendor's site |
When to stay in Figma
- You're still designing: layout, components, spacing and flows before any code exists.
- Your reviewers already work in Figma all day and the artifact is a design.
- You need design-system tooling, handoff and Dev Mode. Ollav does none of that.
When to pick Ollav
- The prototype is code: an HTML file an agent produced, where what matters is how it behaves.
- You want comments on the real page, and the agent to fix them and publish v2 at the same link.
- You'd rather not screenshot the page into a design file just to collect feedback.
A common split: design in Figma, then review the coded result in Ollav.