Feedbucket alternative for AI-made HTML prototypes
Feedbucket is a feedback widget for websites: add a script tag and visitors or clients can send annotated screenshots or screen recordings, with context such as the page URL and browser, into tools like Slack or your tracker. Ollav is for the earlier moment: an agent made you a single HTML file and you want pinned comments on it before there is a site. Checked November 2026; check each vendor's site for current details.
Who this is for
You build prototypes with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Codex and want quick feedback that the same agent can act on, rather than a feedback stream on a deployed site.
Honest overlap
Both save you from "can you screenshot that?" threads and both aim to put feedback next to the thing being discussed. They differ in where the thing lives: Feedbucket sits on a live site you already host; Ollav hosts a self-contained HTML file for you.
Side by side
| Ollav | Feedbucket | |
|---|---|---|
| What you review | One self-contained HTML file (up to 15 MB), uploaded | Your own website, via an embedded widget |
| Needs a deployed site | No | Yes |
| Feedback style | Pinned comments, emoji reactions, emoji pins | Annotated screenshots and screen recordings, per the vendor |
| Reviewers | Signed-in: workspace members or free invited guests | Check the vendor's site |
| New version, same link | Yes, earlier comments kept | n/a (you review the live site) |
| Agents read, reply, resolve and publish a new version | Yes (MCP/REST) | Check the vendor's site |
| Default visibility | Private to your workspace, not indexed | Depends on your site |
| Pricing | Free tier (no card), Pro EUR 12/mo, Team EUR 10/seat/mo (min 3 seats) | Check the vendor's site |
When to pick Feedbucket instead
- You run a real website and want feedback from clients or testers right on it.
- You want screen recordings and page context sent into Slack or a tracker your team already uses.
- Feedback should flow into an existing project workflow, not live in a review page.
When to pick Ollav instead
- It's one HTML file and no site or staging URL exists yet.
- You want the agent that built it to answer the comments and publish a new version.
- You want one stable share URL across versions, with earlier comments kept.
- You want signed-in reviewers, workspace-private by default (not indexed) and a Free tier with no card.
FAQ
Is Ollav a Feedbucket replacement?
Not for feedback on a live website, where Feedbucket is the better fit. Ollav is for reviewing an agent-built HTML file with pinned comments.
Do I need a website to use Ollav?
No. You upload one self-contained HTML file, up to 15 MB, and get a share link. Inline your CSS, JavaScript and images, or load them from absolute https:// URLs.
Who can comment on an Ollav share?
Signed-in reviewers: workspace members or invited guests. Guests are free. Documents are private to your workspace by default and aren't indexed by search engines.
What happens to the link when there's a new version?
It stays the same. Every version lives at one link, and earlier comments are kept.
Can an agent handle the feedback?
Yes. Through MCP or the REST API, an agent (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex) can read comments, reply, resolve threads and publish a new version.
What does Ollav cost?
There is a Free tier and no card is needed. Pro is EUR 12 a month and Team is EUR 10 per seat a month with a minimum of 3 seats, both excluding VAT.
Try it
Upload a file, share the link and see what comes back. The Free tier, no card needed, covers a real review round.